Media Law Prof Blog

Editor: Christine A. Corcos
Louisiana State Univ.

Monday, October 12, 2009

Speech, Filters, and the Internet

Christopher S. Yoo, University of Pennsylvania Law School and Annenberg School for Communication, has published "Free Speech and the Myth of the Internet as an Unintermediated Experience," in volume 78 of the George Washington Law Review (May 2010). Here is the abstract.
In recent years, a growing number of commentators have raised concerns that the decisions made by Internet intermediaries - including last-mile network providers, search engines, social networking sites, and smartphones - are inhibiting free speech and have called for restrictions on their ability to prioritize or exclude content. Such calls ignore the fact that when mass communications are involved, intermediation helps end users to protect themselves from unwanted content and allows them to sift through the avalanche of desired content that grows ever larger every day. Intermediation also helps solve a number of classic economic problems associated with the Internet. In short, intermediation of mass media content is inevitable and often beneficial. Calls to restrict intermediation have also largely overlooked the longstanding tradition reflected in the Supreme Court’s First Amendment jurisprudence with respect to other forms of electronic communication recognizing how intermediaries’ exercises of editorial discretion promote free speech values. The debate also ignores the inauspicious/dubious history of past efforts to regulate the scope of electronic intermediaries’ editorial discretion, which were characterized by the inability to develop coherent standards, a chilling effect on controversial speech, and manipulation of the rules for political purposes.
Download the article from SSRN here.

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Speech, Filters, and the Internet: