Media Law Prof Blog

Editor: Christine A. Corcos
Louisiana State Univ.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Protecting Virtual IP

Brendan James Gilbert, SUNY Buffalo School of Law, and SUNY Buffalo, School of Management, has published "The Second Life of Intellectual Property." Here is the abstract.

Intellectual property holders have invested significant resources into Second Life in pursuit of customers and virtual market share. 15.8 million residents are available to hear your message. Within this virtual world, however, they have found age old intellectual property problems: counterfeiters with virtual Herman Miller furniture and Rolex watches.

Similarly, participants have become residents of Second Life for the opportunity to develop virtual intellectual property.
Virtual art galleries, magazines, and bar associations have sprung up. The United States Patent and Trademark Office has granted
registration to virtual trademarks created within Second Life.

Both real world and virtual world intellectual property holders have come to Linden Research’s Second Life on the premise that their intellectual property would be protected. Is it? How should the added exposure of a virtual intellectual property portfolio be managed by an intellectual property right holder?

Recently filed complaints indicate that Linden Lab’s “commercially reasonable efforts” may not be sufficient. In fact, they may be detrimental to the intellectual property owner. Here, I will discuss suits filed against Linden Lab regarding Second Life’s intellectual property protection. The complaints are illustrative of the peril in having intellectual property rights be privately adjudicated and enforced.

Download the paper from SSRN here.

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Protecting Virtual IP: