February 11, 2009
Evaluating "United States v. Williams" and Protecting Children on the Internet
Congress's latest effort to protect children from on-line predators banned the pandering or soliciting of child pornography regardless of whether the images were actual or virtual. My paper discusses last term's Supreme Court decision in United States v. Williams that upheld the prohibition and ruled that an offer to engage in illegal activity is unprotected speech. I place Williams within the larger context of the classic impossibility defense that differentiates between factually and legally frustrated attempts, and show how the majority and dissenting opinions fall into these two camps. I propose that the revival of the impossibility debate sparked by Internet cases is misguided and that, in fact, the Internet provides the best reason for rejecting impossibility as a bar to prosecuting predators.
Download the paper from SSRN here.
February 11, 2009 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Evaluating "United States v. Williams" and Protecting Children on the Internet: