Friday, September 12, 2014

Oregon Supreme Court Applies Aggregate Settlement Rule to Clergy Abuse

On August 21, 2014, the Oregon Supreme Court embraced the ALI's definition of a non-class aggregate settlement and held that an attorney who represented victims of clergy abuse failed to get the clients' informed consent before distributing a lump-sum settlement.  In In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Daniel J. Gatti, the court noted that Gatti failed to get clients' informed consent in writing to the formula or method he devised to divvy up the defendants' lump-sum settlement payments, which violated Rule 1.8(g).  As a result, the court imposed a 90-day suspension as a sanction.

For more on the problems associated with lump-sum settlements, see Howie's article, The Trouble with All-or-Nothing Settlements.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mass_tort_litigation/2014/09/oregon-supreme-court-applies-aggregate-settlement-rule-to-cleregy-abuse.html

Aggregate Litigation Procedures, Informal Aggregation, Settlement, Sexual Abuse | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01a73e1490ea970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Oregon Supreme Court Applies Aggregate Settlement Rule to Clergy Abuse:

Comments

Post a comment