Sunday, July 14, 2013

Paul McMahon on Proceduralism, Civil Justice, and American Legal Thought

Professor Paul McMahon (Harvard) has posted to SSRN his article, Proceduralism, Civil Justice, and American Legal Thought, 34 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. (forthcoming).  Here's the abstract:

American legal scholars spend a large proportion of their time debating and theorizing procedure. This Article focuses on American proceduralism in the particular field of civil justice and undertakes a detailed comparison with England, where procedural questions receive little academic attention. It finds that procedure is more prominent in America partly because Americans have been more willing than others to use private litigation as a tool for regulation. More significantly, procedural questions necessarily occupy more space in American debates because authority over civil justice is unusually dispersed among different actors; procedural rules allocate power among these actors. But American proceduralism runs deeper than these surface explanations allow, and a full account requires an examination of the history of American legal thought. I trace contemporary American proceduralism to a counter-intuitive source: the emergence of Legal Realism in the 1920s and 1930s.

BGS

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mass_tort_litigation/2013/07/paul-mcmahon-on-proceduralism-civil-justice-and-american-legal-thought.html

Mass Tort Scholarship, Procedure | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0192ac029fa2970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Paul McMahon on Proceduralism, Civil Justice, and American Legal Thought:

Comments

Post a comment