Monday, August 9, 2010

NYTimes Article on Plaintiff Disappointment with 9/11 Settlement

The NY Times' Mireya Navarro has a long article today entitled "9/11 Settlements Bring Moment of Reckoning" about the disappointment of many plaintiffs in the WTC Disaster Site Litigation with the settlements they are being offered.  The settlements take account both of the severity of the injury and the possibility that causation can be proven in court, leaving many with cancer or who have died of cancer getting less than they expected or hoped for. 

A very important twist to the 95% agreement requirement in the settlement is the effect that is having on some plaintiff's decision to settle or not to settle.  One is quoted as saying: "“It weighs heavy on one’s mind that your decision would impact the compensation of those who are sick, because if you don’t get 95 percent you’re not going to settle.”

Another interesting theme that comes out of the article is the expressive uses of the lawsuit for plaintiffs.  One plaintiff who is taking a settlement of approximately $11,000, the article explained "To him, the legal battle was never about the money but about calling attention to the health consequences suffered by those “who stepped up to the plate” after the terrorist attacks."

ADL


http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mass_tort_litigation/2010/08/nytimes-article-on-plaintiff-disappointment-with-911-settlement.html

9/11, Aggregate Litigation Procedures, Settlement | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0133f2f41b11970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NYTimes Article on Plaintiff Disappointment with 9/11 Settlement:

Comments

Post a comment