Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Does Litigation = Regulation?

A very intriguing analysis just posted on bepress calls into question whether litigation is a substitute for regulation.  See Eric Helland and Jonathan Klick, The Relation Between Regulation and Class Actions: Evidence from the Insurance Industry, available here

Here is the abstract:

Standard law and economics models imply that regulation and litigation serve as substitutes. We test this by looking at the incidence of insurance class actions as a function of measures of regulatory enforcement. We also look specifically at whether states with clear regulatory standards regarding the use of OEM parts experience less litigation over this issue. We find no evidence of substitution between regulation and litigation. We also examine the possibility that litigation is more frequent in states where regulators are more likely to be captured by industry interests, finding no support for this hypothesis either. Instead, litigation is more likely in states where similar litigation has been successful in the past, calling into question standard law and economics models in this area.


ADL

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mass_tort_litigation/2009/04/does-regulation-litigation-.html

Class Actions, Mass Tort Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef011570205fdb970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Does Litigation = Regulation? :

Comments

Post a comment