Monday, December 15, 2008

Analysis of the Latest Williams Tobacco Appeal to the Supreme Court

Adam Liptak of the New York Times breaks down the issues in Justices Look Anew at Case in Which Oregon Court Has Twice Rebuffed Them.  Here's an excerpt:

The United States Supreme Court takes its name seriously, and it expects lower courts to follow its instructions. But the Oregon Supreme Court has twice refused to reduce a $79.5 million punitive damages award in the face of increasingly blunt directions from the nation's highest court.

When the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear the Oregon case for a third time in June, many legal experts assumed it did so to teach the lower court a lesson about which court has the last word.

''The Oregon Supreme Court really has continued to be defiant in this case,'' Benjamin C. Zipursky, a Fordham law professor, said.

BGS

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mass_tort_litigation/2008/12/analysis-of-the.html

Punitive Damages, Tobacco | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0105366377ef970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Analysis of the Latest Williams Tobacco Appeal to the Supreme Court:

Comments

Post a comment