« Special Compensation for Victims of Terrorist Attacks? | Main | Moves: Erichson and Burch »
April 15, 2008
Vioxx and Medical Ghostwriters
The New York Times today reported on a JAMA article about medical ghostwriting, raising questions about the integrity of pharmaceutical research studies published in medical journals. Here's how the Times account begins:
The drug maker Merck drafted dozens of research studies for a best-selling drug, then lined up prestigious doctors to put their names on the reports before publication, according to an article to be published Wednesday in a leading medical journal.
The article, based on documents unearthed in lawsuits over the pain drug Vioxx, provides a rare, detailed look in the industry practice of ghostwriting medical research studies that are then published in academic journals.
The article cited one draft of a Vioxx research study that was still in want of a big-name researcher, identifying the lead writer only as “External author?”
Here's a link to the New York Times article, "Ghostwriters Used in Vioxx Studies, Article Says," as well as one to the NYT link to the JAMA article itself.
HME
April 15, 2008 in Pharmaceuticals - Misc., Vioxx | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e551d67d188833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Vioxx and Medical Ghostwriters:
» Ghostwriting of Medical Studies from TortsProf Blog
The New York Times examines the practice of ghost-writing medical research studies that are subsequently published in medical journals such as JAMA:The drug maker Merck drafted dozens of research studies for a best-selling drug, then lined up prestigio... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 16, 2008 5:15:03 AM