December 6, 2007
Clermont & Eisenberg on CAFA (and Republican male judges)
Kevin Clermont and Theodore Eisenberg have posted their new paper, CAFA Judicata, on SSRN. They presented their findings at the University of Pennsylvania’s CAFA symposium last weekend. Here’s the abstract:
The Class Action Fairness Act has taken on its real form through construction by the federal judges. That form emerges in this empirical study of judicial activity and receptivity in regard to the Act. Our data comprise the opinions under the Act published during the two and a half years following its enactment in 2005.
CAFA has produced a lot of litigation in its short life. The cases were varied, of course, but most typically the resulting published federal opinion involved a removed contract case, with the dispute turning on the statute's effective date or on federal jurisdiction. Even though the opinions shed some light on issues such as jurisdictional burden and standard of proof, most of the judicial activity was socially wasteful litigation. It emphasized transitional efforts to interpret sloppily drafted provisions.
More interesting, we saw wise but value-laden resistance by judges to CAFA, as they interpreted it in a way to dampen the early hopes of overly enthusiastic removers. Regression analysis confirms the suggestion that one can derive from percentages of cases decided in certain ways. With the exception of Republican male judges, the federal judiciary has not warmly embraced the statute.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Clermont & Eisenberg on CAFA (and Republican male judges):
» Around the web, December 30 from PointOfLaw Forum
Paul Weiss could reap $174 million contingency fee suing Marsh actuaries on behalf of state of Alaska [Juneau Empire via ABA Journal] Wall Street firms head for court over mortgage derivatives [UK Independent] First successful asbestos suit in South Ko... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 29, 2007 8:23:43 PM