Friday, October 19, 2007

Preclusion of Certain Classwide Liability Findings in Florida Tobacco Litigation Stands

The Supreme Court declined to review the Florida Supreme Court's decision in Engle v. Liggett Group, 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006) on October 1, 2007.  The docket for the cert petition in R.J. Reynolds v. Engle can be found here.  In the Engle decision the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of a $145 million classwide punitive damages verdict, but it also allowed certain liability findings made in Phase I of the trial to stand.  This means that the defendants cannot relitigate some of the issues that it lost in the trial.  The defendants' argument that the question of punitives lacked sufficient commonality for class treatment was adopted, but this ruling on lack of commonality did not extend to some of the underlying issues of liability which did have the requisite commonality, according to the court.   This means that former members of the class can use these findings offensively against the defendants in future suits.

ADL

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mass_tort_litigation/2007/10/preclusion-of-c.html

Procedure, Tobacco | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e54f0f2d1f8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Preclusion of Certain Classwide Liability Findings in Florida Tobacco Litigation Stands:

Comments

my husband suffered a heart attack and had bypass surgery in the mid ninties after 35 years of smoking, but did not live in florida at that time and is not eligible for a litigation claim there. We lived in Texas from 1994 to 1999 and then in California before moving to Florida in 2002. Is there a state that can help us with smoking litigation?

Posted by: andy chancellor | Jul 3, 2008 2:02:08 PM

Post a comment