« October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007 | Main | November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007 »

November 7, 2007


The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Employment Non-Discrimination Act today by a 235-184 vote.

According to the Human Rights Campaign, "[i]n 31 states, it is currently legal to fire someone based on their sexual orientation.  In 39 states, it is legal to fire a person for being transgender."

Unfortunately, the ENDA that passed did not include protection for transgendered individuals due to a lack of support in the House.  However, the fact that the ENDA passed is a sign that lawmakers are interested in protecting gays and lesbians against discrimination at work--and that is a start.


November 7, 2007 in Employment Discrimination, Sara R. Benson | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

November 6, 2007

Florida Amendment Banning Same-Sex Marriage Gaining Momentum

Florida law already prohibits same-sex marriage.  However, like many states, Florida voters and legislators wish to enact a State Constitutional Amendment banning gay marriage.  The drive stems from voter concern that Florida courts might recognize gay marriage, overturning current State legislation.

The text of the proposed Amendment states:

"Inasmuch as marriage is the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife, no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized."  See Herald Tribune Article.

The language of the amendment is so broad, however, that it might impact gay and straight couples alike.  The term "substantial equivalent" could be a problem for straight couples who have not wed, but enjoy health and retirement benefits due to county domestic partnership protections. 

Domestic Parenter county laws have been upheld by Florida courts in the past.  Broward County, for example, enacted law that protected "domestic partners" by granting them limited economic benefits if they work for the county.  Lowe v. Broward County, 766 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. App. 2000).  For instance, an employee of Broward County may elect to add a domestic partner to his or her insurance policy (whether the domestic partner is of the same sex or opposite sex).  This statute was upheld against a challenge that it conflicted with the State DOMA Act.  Id.

However, as the language of the proposed Amendment is so broad, domestic partnership State benefits (for both gay and heterosexual couples) may not survive scrutiny.  Thus, heterosexual couples and gay couples alike could be impacted by the broad text of the Amendment, if it gains the 13,000 votes necessary to place it on the Nov. ballot and, subsequently, is adopted to the Florida Constitution.


November 6, 2007 in Equal Protection, Family Law, Sara R. Benson | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack