Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Don't use "they" to refer to a singular noun

The legal writing listserv is abuzz with posts about whether a writer can use "they," "their," or "them" to refer to a singular noun. In legal writing, this problem tends to arise in two different situations. One is where a singular entity--often a corporation or a court--is made up of individuals. When speaking informally, many English speakers would say, "The corporation published their annual report." The problem also arises where an individual's gender is unknown or unimportant, leading to the informal wording, "A student left their book on the desk." 

Language does change; for example, the second-person singular pronouns "thou" and "thee" have disappeared from contemporary English, leaving only the potentially ambiguous "you" for both the singular and the plural.  (We in the South use the convenient "y'all" to indicate a plural meaning.)  English may now be undergoing a change in the usage of third-person plural pronouns.

However, both of the above examples remain incorrect in current formal writing. As some listserv contributors have pointed out, using "they" for a singular antecedent is especially problematic in legal writing, which should be both formal and exact. There are several ways to avoid an incorrect "they." Instead of writing, "A lawyer should file their brief on time," a writer can make the antecedent plural: "Lawyers should file their briefs on time." For other suggestions, see my article on judges and gender-neutral language.

(jdf)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legalwriting/2013/01/dont-use-they-to-refer-to-a-singular-noun.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017c35ddae9a970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Don't use "they" to refer to a singular noun:

Comments

Judith,

Do you still insist that John Kirkby created the much-maligned rule to use the default masculine pronouns he or him where the antecedent noun is sex-indeterminate? Your 2009 article places the blame on Kirkby, as does your forthcoming article in the Women's Rights Law Reporter.

Have you dismissed the research by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, who contends that an 18th-Century schoolteacher — Ann Fisher — created the rule? Based on Tieken-Boon van Ostade's research, Patricia O'Conner concluded that Fisher was the source of the rule. I have too.

Who's right?

Posted by: Matthew Salzwedel | Jan 17, 2013 8:44:14 PM

Post a comment