August 18, 2011
Two Recent Motions Worth a Read (or Look)
Desktop document editing software is expanding the modes of presentation available to motion writers. Many motions, in both state and federal court, now include full color photographs embedded in the text. For those who want to explore this development with students, both the Dallas Mavericks and Manny Pacquiao have recently filed entertaining photo motions in two high profile sports related cases. The motions are available here and here. The Mavericks’ Motion for Summary Judgment uses a photo of the Mavs on the championship podium last season to counter claims that Mark Cuban is mismanaging the team. Pacquiao’s Motion for Sanctions uses photos that are purportedly of Floyd Mayweather partying while allegedly not complying with discovery obligations. I am not convinced of the merits of the Mavericks’ motion, but it is an excellent example of a court filing as a public relations vehicle. And anytime you get to file a motion with a picture of Dirk holding the championship trophy, I think you have already won (no disrespect to Heat fans).
Is the photo motion trend a good thing for legal writing? Are pictures really worth 1000 words? I am convinced that the Mavericks' photo is worth the space, but what about Pacquiao’s photo montage? Effective or gratuitous?
August 18, 2011 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Two Recent Motions Worth a Read (or Look):
» Pictures in briefs from the (new) legal writer
Can you put a picture in a legal brief? If the brief is for a U.S. Court of Appeals, you sure can. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(a)(1)(C) allows photographs, illustrations, and tables to be reproduced in a brief by... [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 19, 2011 3:21:13 PM
Posted by: JBS | Aug 19, 2011 7:57:57 AM