Thursday, January 28, 2010

Partner to associates: sometimes there's no substitute for face-mail

Writing emails is great but one partner reminds firm associates that sometimes there's no substitute for face-time with a client.  In a New York Times interview, Bryan Cave chairman Don Lents advises young lawyers that

“if you think you are going to have a difficult interaction with a colleague or a client, if you can do it face to face that’s better, because you can read the body language and other social signals.”

“In texting and e-mails or even videoconferencing, you can’t always gauge the reaction and sometimes things can have a tendency to be misunderstood, or they can ratchet up to a level of seriousness that you didn’t anticipate,” he added. “In person, you see that somebody reacting in a way that you didn’t expect. Then you can stop and figure out what’s going on, and adapt.”

The problem, says Lents, is a generation gap such that younger lawyers are so used to communicating electronically, they may not understand the importance of face-to-face meetings in terms of client relations.  You can read the rest  of Mr. Lents' thoughts hereregarding the pros and cons of email/texting versus in-person communication.

Hat tip to the online ABA Journal.

I am the scholarship dude.

(jbl)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legalwriting/2010/01/partner-to-associate-sometimes-theres-no-substitute-for-facemail.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a819d137970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Partner to associates: sometimes there's no substitute for face-mail:

Comments

Post a comment