January 13, 2010
Justice Scalia admonishes lawyer: "Choate ain't a word"
During an oral argument back in November, Justice Scalia admonished an attorney that there's no such adjective as "choate." You know, the opposite of inchoate. Apparently Justice Scalia has been grinding this axe since at least 1992 and "is disgusted by the term’s faulty etymological basis." Bryan Garner, Scalia's co-author of “Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges” and the editor of Black's Law Dictionary, agrees:
The in- in inchoate is not a negative prefix, Garner explains in his Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage. It comes from the Latin verb incohare, meaning “to begin, start out.” Taking away the in- from inchoate to form choate is back-formation and is part of a long tradition of removing prefixes and suffixes to find “roots” that were never there, the Times says.
Garner says choate is accepted and used even by those who deprecate its origins.
You can read the rest of the story courtesy of the online ABA Journal here.
I am the scholarship dude.
January 13, 2010 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Justice Scalia admonishes lawyer: "Choate ain't a word":
Remember, Scalia's father was a professor of romance languages...
Posted by: Mark DeForrest | Jan 13, 2010 8:25:56 AM