Monday, January 18, 2010

"bottomheavy" legal writing

ImagesCAH9QON3 Joan Magat at Duke has written an article on the problem of Bottomheavy: Legal Footnotes .  Yes, I can hear many legal writing professors cheering.  Here's her abstract:

"For decades, legal footnotes have been the deserving target of both ample criticism and self-mockery. Apart from their complaints as to footnotes’ mere existence, most critics draw a bead on the ballooning of footnote content. Some journal editors, aspiring to respond to this sound theme, hopefully inform their authors of a preference for “light footnoting.” But where does an author begin to trim, and what editor has the audacity to slash what the author (or her research assistant) has so laboriously compiled below the line? Changing our footnote habits is about benefits and costs. To gain the former, we must ante up. If criticism began the round of bidding, this article modestly raises the stakes, suggesting a rule of reason that might govern the author’s, the editor’s, and the reader’s expectations for footnotes. A gamble, perhaps, but one that might be worth taking. "

(spl)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legalwriting/2010/01/bottomheavy-legal-writing.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a7e7a49c970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "bottomheavy" legal writing:

Comments

Post a comment