June 10, 2009
Law profs sue West Publishing for falsely attributing their names to poorly researched treatise
Here's the skinny courtesy of Law.com:
In the suit, professors David Rudovsky of the University of Pennsylvania Law School and Leonard Sosnov of Widener Law School claim that they did none of the work on the December 2008 supplement, or "pocket part," to their book, "Pennsylvania Criminal Procedure: Law, Commentary and Forms."
Their lawyer, Richard L. Bazelon of Bazelon Less & Feldman, argued that the supplement was a "sham" that offered almost nothing new to subscribers and that users of the book would mistakenly connect the poor quality to Rudovsky and Sosnov.
Over the two decades since the treatise was written, Bazelon said, the professors have routinely added about 150 new cases each year in annual updates. But the supplement published in December 2008, he said, added just three new cases and failed to take note of any of the cases that had been reversed in the past year by the state Supreme Court.
Read about the whole sordid affair right here.
I am the scholarship dude.
June 10, 2009 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Law profs sue West Publishing for falsely attributing their names to poorly researched treatise: