December 17, 2007
Professor Lou Sirico, at Villanova University, has published an article on Readability Studies: How Technocentrism Can Compromise Research an Legal Determinations, 26 Quinnipiac Law Review 147 (2007).
Here is his summary:
"One way to determine whether consumers understand a document is to use a readability formula to assign it a score. These formulas calculate readability by counting such variables as the number of words and syllables in a passage or document. The idea of readability formulas has been defined as "an equation which combines those text features that best predict text difficulty. The equation is usually developed by studying the relationship between text features (e.g., words, sentences) and text difficulty (e.g., reading comprehension, reading rate, and expert judgment of difficulty)." Even though readability formulas are mechanical and imperfect, they are easy to apply and, therefore, popular.
"The Flesch-Kincaid test is one popular readability formula, perhaps because Microsoft Word allows users to apply it easily to documents that are typed or pasted into the program. If Microsoft's readability program is flawed, however, it compromises the results of the many researchers who have relied on it."
You can access the article via Lexis or Westlaw, although the appendix is not included there.
December 17, 2007 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Readability Research :
» Is the Accuracy of Microsoft Word in Question? from Set in Style
The Legal Writing Prof Blog has this post about a new article: Readability Studies: How Technocentrism Can Compromise Research an Legal Determinations, 26 Quinnipiac Law Review 147 (2007). According to the post, its about readability formulas, a... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 17, 2007 8:15:28 PM