April 20, 2007
Every now and then a law student will use the blended conjunction "and/or." My usual comment on their paper is that this construction is too vague for legal writing; it's just not precise enough. Now I think I'll also refer them to http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/07/02/061660P.pdf to illustrate that "and" and "or" can lead to problems.
hat tip: Prof. Andrew Solomon, South Texas College of Law
April 20, 2007 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference and/or:
I've blogged about this case; see http://adamsdrafting.com/system/2007/02/04/new-or-case/. As for and/or, I think its meaning is clear: A and/or B means A or B or both. But it's not particularly elegant, and it's clearer to say A or B or both. That said, I find that sometimes the components of a sentence are sufficiently involved that and/or becomes the simplest option.
Posted by: Ken Adams | Apr 20, 2007 5:32:50 PM