Sunday, January 29, 2012
Each January, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania identifies the most significant Pennsylvania disciplinary cases of the past year.
In selecting the cases, The Board looks at several factors, including (in no particular order):
- Unusual or extraordinary fact situations;
- Decisions which address legal issues that often come up in disciplinary cases;
- Decisions which discuss the meaning of one of the Rules of Professional Conduct or Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement;
- Decisions which present reviews of prior cases on a subject;
- Decisions addressing new issues, especially involving technology;
- Decisions regarding situations which may arise regularly in the practice of law.
Here’s a link to summaries of those cases.
On the national front, John Steele of the Legal Ethics Forum has identified his Top Ten Ethics Stories of 2011.