Thursday, January 20, 2011

We teach them nothing, Lebowski!

So says this U. of Chicago study that concludes college professors don't have much effect on student learning.  I've read similar studies in the past that have concluded student thinking doesn't fundamentally change as the result of college - even among the A students.  Here's a summary of this new study from Inside Higher Ed:

If the purpose of a college education is for students to learn, academe is failing, according to Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses, a book being released today by University of Chicago Press.

The book cites data from student surveys and transcript analysis to show that many college students have minimal classwork expectations -- and then it tracks the academic gains (or stagnation) of 2,300 students of traditional college age enrolled at a range of four-year colleges and universities. The students took the Collegiate Learning Assessment (which is designed to measure gains in critical thinking, analytic reasoning and other "higher level" skills taught at college) at various points before and during their college educations, and the results are not encouraging:

  • 45 percent of students "did not demonstrate any significant improvement in learning" during the first two years of college.
  • 36 percent of students "did not demonstrate any significant improvement in learning" over four years of college.
  • Those students who do show improvements tend to show only modest improvements. Students improved on average only 0.18 standard deviations over the first two years of college and 0.47 over four years. What this means is that a student who entered college in the 50th percentile of students in his or her cohort would move up to the 68th percentile four years later -- but that's the 68th percentile of a new group of freshmen who haven't experienced any college learning.

"How much are students actually learning in contemporary higher education? The answer for many undergraduates, we have concluded, is not much," write the authors, Richard Arum, professor of sociology and education at New York University, and Josipa Roksa, assistant professor of sociology at the University of Virginia. For many undergraduates, they write, "drifting through college without a clear sense of purpose is readily apparent."

You can read more of the IHE's report here and some additional commentary from IHE entitled, appropriately enough, "So we teach them nothing.  Now what?"

(jbl).

 

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_skills/2011/01/we-teach-them-nothing-lebowski.html

| Permalink

Comments

You are correct, sir. The change has been made.

Posted by: Jim | Jan 21, 2011 7:16:28 PM

Would "effect" be better in the lead sentence?

Posted by: Otto Stockmeyer | Jan 21, 2011 6:34:57 AM

Post a comment