December 28, 2010
Wednesday fun: Federal court ordered a motion denied due to incomprehensibility
Before the court is a motion entitled “Defendant’s Motion to Discharge Response to Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Response Opposing Objection to Discharge.” Doc. #7. As background, this adversary was commenced on December 14, 2005 with the filing of the plaintiff’s complaint objecting to the debtor’s discharge. (Doc. #1). Defendant answered the complaint on January 12, 2006. Doc. #3. Plaintiff responded to the Defendant’s answer on January 26, 2006. Doc. #6. On February 3, 2006, Defendant filed the above entitled motion. The court cannot determine the substance, if any, of the Defendant’s legal argument, nor can the court even ascertain the relief that the Defendant is requesting. The Defendant’s motion is accordingly denied for being incomprehensible.
Hat tip to Above the Law.
December 28, 2010 | Permalink
http://duischooltruth.wordpress.com - The mission of DUI School Truth is to identify the testing and evaluation criteria of the various substance abuse programs used by the United States, relating to the Department of Motor Vehicles licensing of drivers. DUI School Truth compiles information on what they are looking for, how they score the tests, and provides this information to the participants of the various programs as a public service.
Posted by: JR Harris | Jan 9, 2011 12:59:34 PM