Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Griffith Univ. and Univ. of Queensland (Aus.) To Hold International Ethics Conference Mid-July 2008

"The Third International Legal Ethics Conference will be held on Australia's beautiful Gold Coast on 13-16 July 2008. ... The primary aim of the conference is to provide a forum for informed and lively debate within the various conference themes."  Detailed Information, speakers, and a call for papers are linked here.  Our prior link here to the colorful and printable conference schedule.

Notably for LPB readers:

The conference will be designed to cater for both scholars and legal practitioners, with a designated "practitioners’ day" which will include papers, presentations and discussions of particular relevance to practising lawyers.

The conference themes embrace international perspectives, and will provide delegates709571_csp_my_australia from Australia and abroad with opportunities to hear and share ideas and arguments that have implications for "lawyering" across jurisdictions.

[Alan Childress]

May 20, 2008 in Comparative Professions, Conferences & Symposia, Ethics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Andrew Perlman Opens LEF Coffers To Make New Friends

Posted by Alan Childress

Speaking of Suffolk and Legal Ethics Forum (intersected in this previous post), their own Andy Perlman has posted this generous invite to a Thurs. May 29 dinner in a Boston restaurant.  It is for interested bloggers and friends who are in town as part of the ABA meeting in Boston May 28-31. That is the 34th National Aperlman Conference on Professional Responsibility. The conference is to be held at the Seaport Hotel in Boston.  You can approach him by face (<---) at the conference.

I wish I could join him then, especially since dinner is discounted via using LEF ad revenues.  One of the ironies of the google ad sense algorithm that generates some funds for LEF is that slogans for ads can appear randomly and incongrously right next to their substantive posts.  I note that right now displayed next to Andy's post on this dinner are the large words, "Best Kept Secret?"  But anyway that week is also the Law and Society Association's annual meeting; this year it is in Montreal, with several panels on lawyers and the profession.  I will be there and hope to meet some readers and old friends (dutch). 

But, seriously, this is actually very nice of Andy and we salute him.  I hope Jeff goes and blogs on it.

May 20, 2008 in Conferences & Symposia | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Law & Society Ass'n Conference (May 29-June 1, Montreal) Has Panels on Legal Profession

Posted by Alan Childress

The annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, this year in conjunction with the Canadian Law & Society Association, will be held in Montreal, Canada, from May 29-June 1, 2008 (with some events, particularly of the Canadian group, a few days after).  Here is program and hotel information, and a guide to the many interesting panels proposed: Download prog_4_10.doc.  Some of them deal with issues of legal business and practice, including trends in big firms and problems of prosecutorial misconduct.  One I look forward to is hearing Marc Galanter and Bill Henderson on "the [new, elastic] tournament of lawyers" and their study forthcoming in Stanford Law Review, as noted on at Legal Ethics Forum here, with a link to the SSRN version of their important paper.

UPDATE:  Other Law & Society panels on the legal profession, law firms, and global practice are listed in comments to this post at LEF, including a May 29 presentation (on biglaw engagement agreements) by one of its editors, John Steele.  That panel goes on my to-do list too.

April 22, 2008 in Conferences & Symposia, Law & Business, Law & Society, Law Firms | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Call for Papers - 2009 AALS Annual Meeting - Joint Program of the Professional Responsibility and Clinical Sections

CALL FOR AALS ANNUAL MEETING PRESENTATION PROPOSALS Joint Professional Responsibility and Clinical Sections 2009 AALS Annual Meeting Program, Jan.7-10, 2009;  Session Commemorating the Fortieth Anniversary of the Council on Legal Education for Professional Responsibility (CLEPR).

The Planning Committee for the 2009 AALS Annual Meeting Joint Program of the Professional Responsibility and Clinical Sections is seeking innovative proposals for presentations or posters related to the teaching of ethical reflection in law practice and related topics for possible inclusion in the 2009 annual meeting program.  Preference will be given to proposals involving interactive presentations.  Potential presentation topics might include: innovative methods of teaching reflective learning about professional values and goals through case rounds, simulations, case studies, or externship seminars; teaching of legal ethics and professionalism values through the pervasive method and/or by integrating ethics and professional reflection into substantive law courses and subjects; and assessment in course components addressed to the development of reflective, ethics and professionalism skills. 

The Planning Committee will consider proposals for possible oral or poster presentations.  Please submit proposals describing anticipated presentation, along with  any supporting materials, to Susan Carle at scarle@wcl.american.edu, by June 15, 2008.

[Jeff Lipshaw]

April 22, 2008 in Conferences & Symposia, Professional Responsibility | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (1)

Friday, April 11, 2008

May 1 Conference in Chicago on the Business of Legal Practice: Death to Billables? Cynicism in Business Advising?

Posted by Alan Childress

I posted this announcement two weeks ago on a symposium by DePaul's law school, to be held on May Day in Chicago, about the ethics of the business of practicing law. One of the hot topics is on the issue of billable hours. Here is another blog post about it, from an interested party planning to go. The post is by our own blogeague Nancy Rapoport, on her own blog. 

Nancy has also posted a thoughtful post on what a law school ideally wants in a faculty.  See it at Madisonian.net here, and the reaction to it by Michael Froomkin at Miami here. Froomkin gives her post "the biggest cheer" among Madisonian's mobblog on legal education.  Every law teacher should read it.

Finally, Nancy references, recommends, and links an excellent post on business ethics from our own Jeff Lipshaw, posted over at Concurring Opinions, entitled Realism and Idealism in Business Ethics: A Post-Bear Reflection.  Jeff fights the notion that the accurate message to law students about corporate legal advising is cynical, that "the corporate world is corrupting and essentially random and beyond your control, and there's not a whole lot you can do about it, except hope that your figurative airplane doesn't crash."

April 11, 2008 in Conferences & Symposia | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

DePaul Offers Great Symposium May 1 on the Ethics of the BUSINESS of Law

Posted by Alan Childress

The DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal, with the Commercial Law League of America (site is here), has announced its sixth annual symposium: Lawyers, Law Firms, & the Legal Profession: An Ethical View of the Business of Law. It is upcoming on May 1, 2008, from 10:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.  "Leading experts, timely issues, and CLE credit are just a few of the reasons to come."  Topics include Lawyers in a Fee Quandary: Must the Billable Hour Die?, the Roberts Court, Ghosts from old law firms haunting a new firm, and lawyer discipline and professionalism.  It will be held at the Westin on Michigan Ave., Chicago.  Here is the program announcement: Download symp_article.doc.

April 1, 2008 in Conferences & Symposia | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Friday, March 7, 2008

Legal History Panel in D.C. Mar. 18, at GW Law's Institute for Constitutional Studies

Posted by Alan Childress0805083421l

Here is a link to a public-is-welcome panel in Washington, D.C., of "author meets critics" on Charles Lane's new book The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, the Supreme Court, and the Betrayal of Reconstruction.   Lane is a reporter at the Washington Post.  Sad story out of reconstruction Louisiana that makes Jena seem like the rainbow coalition.

The panel will be held at 4:00 p.m. on Tues., March 18, 2008, at George Washington U. Law School (Faculty conference room); it is sponsored by its Institute for Constitutional Studies. Refreshments served!

March 7, 2008 in Conferences & Symposia | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Monday, January 21, 2008

Legal Ethics Conference in Australia in mid-July 2008

Posted by Alan Childress

Here is news about a conference on legal ethics, including international issues, in Queensland, Australia this summer (well, winter). 

The Third International Legal Ethics Conference will be held on Australia's beautiful Gold Coast on 13-16 July 2008. ... The conference will be designed to cater for both scholars and legal practitioners, with a designated "practitioners’ day" which will include papers, presentations and 709571_csp_my_australia discussions of particular relevance to practising lawyers.

The conference themes embrace international perspectives, and will provide delegates from Australia and abroad with opportunities to hear and share ideas and arguments that have implications for "lawyering" across jurisdictions.

It is hosted by the TC Beirne School of Law (University of Queensland) and Griffith Law School (Griffith University).  Sounds like a great idea for U.S. scholars and lawyers, too.  And for the colorful conference brochure: Download legal-ethics-conference-brochure.pdf

January 21, 2008 in Conferences & Symposia | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Friday, January 18, 2008

D.C. Panel on Law Practice in the Internet Age, Jan. 24, Looks Like Fun

Posted by Alan Childress

The D.C. Bar is cosponsoring a mini-conference -- unfortunately with no CLE credit available -- but with a fun cast and interesting topic.  The panel talk will be held over a long lunch on Thurs., Jan. 24, 2008 (or by teleconference for those afar).  Its blurb is:

Practicing Law in the E-Court of Public Opinion:  How the Internet Can Make or Break a Lawyer's or Law Firm's Reputation and What You Can Do about It - WITH DAVID LAT of ABOVE THE LAW and other national speakers!

In the Internet Age, lawyers and firms are subject to unprecedented public scrutiny.  Popular websites like Above the Law provides gossip and behind the scenes news from large law firms, while Avvo allows clients to post their opinions about their attorneys.  You'll hear how the web can affect lawyers' reputations, for better or for worse, identify ways to respond to threats to reputation and use the Internet to your advantage and learn about relevant legal concepts like First Amendment, libel and privacy law that relate to your ability to protect your reputation.  We'll have a panel of nationally recognized speakers as well as law firm marketing personnel (TBD) who will offer practical tips on guarding and promoting your reputation on line.

All the D.C. events this month are linked here, so look for Jan. 24 to register for this panel. (Many others do carry CLE credit.)  The moderator is MyShingle's Carolyn Elefant, and her post on the "star studded panel" and event is here.

January 18, 2008 in Conferences & Symposia | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Sunday, October 14, 2007

Tevye's Question, the Myth of the Horizontal Organization (Again), Interdisciplinary Work, and Rob Kar's Great Idea

Posted by Jeff Lipshaw

Having just returned from the Midwestern Law and Economics Association conference, and having this morning read Rob Kar's great first post on PrawfsBlawg (what is he going to do for a follow up to that?), I was reminded again of the fundamental question Tevye the Dairyman, the protagonist of The Fiddler on the Roof, raised about interdisciplinary studies.  Tevye, in advising his daughter about the problems of inter-marriage, says "a fish could marry a bird, but where would they live?"

The myth of horizontal organization is that you can keep a business organization dynamic and growing merely by agglomerating value-creating specialties. But if that's the case, it's like fish and birds, and who sees the places where neither of them live? Either everybody is responsible for the gaps between specialties (which means nobody is responsible) or nobody is responsible.

My talk at MLEA dealt in the broadest sense of trying to use algorithmic economic models to map linguistic or moral models.  That is, can you draw legal policy conclusions by trying to cast what the parties mean in a contract into the equations of welfare economics so as to resolve disputes about contract interpretation in an economically efficient way?  While I'd say about 40% of my time on this over the last couple weeks has been devoted to refining the point I was trying to make, the other 60% was devoted to what is essentially translation.  My first attempts, thoughtfully critiqued by colleagues Eric Blumenson and Andy Perlman, were largely cast in terms of the jargon of philosophy of language and cognitive science, and I thought we made great strides in bringing the ideas to a common denominator of relatively plain English (albeit plain English with words I made up).  Nevertheless, I have reason to believe I was not entirely successful (nor unsuccessful) in communicating with the audience. 

On the flip side, there were portions of the conference - mostly those with complex equations - as to which I might as well as been have been listening to a talk in French.  I would have understood enough of the syntax and the occasional words or English cognates to be able to say, with about this level of specificity:  "they are talking, I think, about wine, and either about its price or the tannin levels."

Which brings me back to the subject of Rob Kar's post, about which I have great passion.  He's responding to the response by Brian Leiter and Michael Weisberg to the recent convergence of law and evolutionary biology, which they criticized.  Now, again, we have a translation issue, but I read the Leiter/Weisman critique as saying evolutionary biology has yet to show it is capable of shedding light on the "non-plasticity" of behaviors, such that they might be the subject of legal policy.  I interpret non-plasticity as the behavior being fixed, or rigid, or hard-wired, or universal in a particular circumstance, as shown biologically, such that we might have confidence that the generalization in a legal rule is neither under-inclusive or over-inclusive.  I think Rob agrees with that (as do I), but his broader point goes back to how fish and birds, or sub-specialties, might learn to talk to each other, much less live together.

The point is the myth of the horizontal organization.  A new discipline that fits in between the cracks of the old ones needs to adopt its own rigorous standards, but they won't be the standards of any of the contributing disciplines.  I particularly took to heart Rob's inclusion of the philosophy of science and an analogy to meta-ethical thinking in the mix of disciplines that might inform this venture.   Particularly as to the latter, without a good dose of thinking about thinking, the project will never be more than the sum of its parts.

October 14, 2007 in Comparative Professions, Conferences & Symposia, Economics, Lipshaw | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Friday, October 12, 2007

Live from the MLEA

Posted by Jeff Lipshaw

Law_logo_smAs I mentioned this morning, I'm at the University of Minnesota Law School for the Midwestern Law and Economics Association Annual Conference.   Myself excluded, the agenda includes an impressive group of speakers.

I spoke early today on Aboutness, Thingness, Models, and Understanding, and was not hit by a single tomato.  Somebody did pick up on my introductory reference to Stephen Stills at Woodstock.  He, of course, was ingesting recreational substances at the time; I was not.

The best thing about this has been the broad range of subjects, from financial services regulation to law school rankings to tissue transfer ("Gimme Some Skin:  When Tissue Banks Compete for Transplant Tissue, Who Wins?" by Robert Katz of IU-Indianapolis, which is going on right now).

Speaking of Stephen Stills and Woodstock, we are just now moving into medical marijuana exemptions, so I'm signing off.

October 12, 2007 in Conferences & Symposia | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

AALS Professional Responsibility Section's Newest Newsletter Now Available

Posted by Alan Childress

Thanks to the generosity of Randy Lee (Widener) and Russ Pearce (Fordham), and many others who contribute to it, here is the recent quarterly newsletter of the AALS Section on Professional Responsibility.  It contains all sorts of case and rules summaries, article cites, announcements of conferences and meetings, career opportunities and updates, and editorials...in short, a wealth of info helpful to anyone interested in the field, not just law profs.  Retrieve it in PDF format here:  Download profrespnewsletter_sum07.pdf

September 25, 2007 in Conferences & Symposia, Professional Responsibility, Teaching & Curriculum | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Darian Ibrahim's Paper on Angel Investor Contracts

The Conglomerate Junior Scholars Workshop continues, with a neat paper from Darian Ibrahim on angel investors and a series of responses from luminaries like Larry Ribstein, Barbara Black, George Dent, and David Hoffman.

For the uninitiated, angel investors are those brave souls who put the first significant money into a start-up enterprise.  They overlap on the more developed end with venture capitalists, and on the less developed end with the holy triad known as "FFF:"  friends, family, and fools.

Being the hedgehog I am (wandering, I think, in the instant classic Solum sense - how does he do it?) about the lawyers' impulse toward a certain kind of rationality, and underlying (and autopoietic - look that one up!) presumption that the impulse is correct, I supplied a lengthy comment to Christine Hurt's intro to the discussion.

[Jeff Lipshaw]

July 11, 2007 in Abstracts Highlights - Academic Articles on the Legal Profession, Conferences & Symposia, Economics, Law & Business | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Marquette to Host Dispute Resolution "Works in Progress" Conference

One of our favorite people, Andrea Schneider (Marquette, right) passes along the news that Marquette LawAndreaschneider School will be holding its First Annual Dispute Resolution Works in Progress Conference on October 19-20, 2007.  "The Conference is an opportunity for scholars from all over the country to meet others who are Marquette teaching and researching in dispute resolution. Join us and present your recent scholarship or works in progress, get feedback from colleagues, and learn about other research projects underway. Although we encourage you to share your current endeavors, you do not need to be a presenter to attend."  More at the conference web page.

[Jeff Lipshaw]

July 10, 2007 in Conferences & Symposia | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Monday, May 28, 2007

ABA In Chicago

The 33rd annual ABA National Conference on Professional Responsibility will take place in Chicago this week. Here is the link to the schedule. A number of panels will address topics of interest. One session will deal with overbearing partners; another wiill consider the ethics of lawyers in an organizational setting.  There will also be a panel that will consider the ethical issues of lawyers who act as expert witnesses. A fourth panel will feature a retrospective on the famous New York "buried bodies" case with Frank H. Armani, one of the lawyers confronted with the ethical issue, Monroe Freedman and Thomas Morgan participating. (Mike Frisch)

May 28, 2007 in Conferences & Symposia | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Friday, April 6, 2007

California Ethics Symposium

The California State Bar is presenting an ethics symposium on May 19 at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles. Among the panel topics are ethics issues in family law practice, transactional practice and an update on proposed revisions to the California ethics rules.  More here.  (Mike Frisch)

April 6, 2007 in Conferences & Symposia | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Tuesday, April 3, 2007

California Bar Ethics Symposium in L.A. at Southwestern on 5/19

Hm_sidebar_logo_bg The California bar website announces the 11th Annual Statewide Annual Ethics Symposium --- May 19, 2007, Southwestern Law School, Los Angeles"This year’s theme is 'Ethics Around the Edges' and will include sessions on transactional practice, Sarbanes-Oxley and other topics."  MCLE credit is available.  Call 415-538-2167.   [Alan Childress]

April 3, 2007 in CLE, Conferences & Symposia, Ethics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Call for Involvement and Discussion on Graying of the Bar

David Giacalone, who previously posted at f/k/a this great post on the ethics of the demographic changes -- tidal wave -- just ahead with the bar (plus see ours here), since updated his post with a request for more discussion (and links).  David is asking for CLE and symposium involvement in placing this subject on the agenda nationwide, and for LAPs to consider this reality.  Also see his announcement below the fold.  [Alan Childress]

Continue reading

March 28, 2007 in Blogging, Conferences & Symposia, Ethics | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Law & Society Annual Meeting - Panel on The New Formalism

Posted by Jeff Lipshaw

I thoMzeisbergught, particularly after taking the MPRE without too noticeable an increase in my heart rate, I wasLsa2007logo2 beyond getting too nervous about professional challenges any more.  But this one may test my aerobic condition.

Larry Solum (Illinois) has organized an otherwise luminous round table for Saturday afternoon (2:30 pm), July 28, at the Law & Society Association's annual meeting at Humboldt University in Berlin, and somehow  got confused and included me on it.  The subject is "The New Formalism," and in addition to Larry, the participants will be Dennis Patterson (Rutgers-Camden), Randy Barnett (Georgetown), and Mariah Zeisberg (Michigan - Political Science, left).  Here's the abstract of the planned discussion:

Formalist modalities of legal reasoning have recently come to the fore in a variety of contexts. In the theory of constitutional interpretation, the so-called “new originalism” or “original meaning originalism” has gained new prominence and transcended association with conservative judicial politics. In the theory of statutory interpretation, plain meaning or textualist approaches, once considered outre, are increasing dominant in both judicial practice and scholarly debates. Even in the realm of common-law judicial decision making, instrumentalist approaches are challenged by advocates of “strong stare decisis”. This roundtable will discuss the “new formalism,” from the a variety of perspectives, including jurisprudence, political theory, and the philosophy of language.

I will be making my first official appearance with "Suffolk Law School" on my badge.  If my voice does not quaver too much, I will offer some thoughts on formalism and neo-formalism in contract law.

March 15, 2007 in Conferences & Symposia, Law & Society, Lipshaw | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Call 4 Papers: SOX, SEC Reforms, and Sec Reg for AALS in NYC 1/08

Posted by Alan Childress
This from the Legal Scholarship Network of SSRN, with submission info here below the fold:



      After the collapse of Enron, Adelphia, Worldcom and other
      high flyers of the 1990s, there was a crisis of confidence
      in American business and securities regulators. Numerous
      federal and state enforcement and regulatory actions
       occurred in the wake of these scandals. These included: theStack_newspapers
      passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; the research
      analyst prosecutions by the New York Attorney General and
      the Securities and Exchange Commission and the reform of
      the regulation of analysts; and prosecutions of mutual
      funds and reform of mutual fund governance. A torrent of
      criminal prosecutions and civil litigation under Rule 10b-5
      and other securities law statutes also occurred.

      Numerous law review articles have been written, explaining,
      praising or criticizing these developments. Currently,
      several high-powered decision makers have asserted that theWool_socks_1
      U.S. capital markets are becoming less competitive than
      overseas markets due, in part, to the U.S. regulatory and
      litigation environment. Further, there has been a push
      back in the courts as to expansive interpretations by the
      SEC of its authority and expansive district court opinions
      regarding the reach of the anti-fraud provisions.

      We are seeking papers for the January 2008 meeting of the
      AALS Securities Regulation Section in New York discussing
      any aspect of these developments. A broad range of topics91643_65432233_2
      is possible, and we hope to have a lively discussion on
       whether regulatory and litigation developments have gone
      too far, not far enough or have appropriately dealt with
      the problems which led to the 1990s stock market bubble and
      its collapse. A special issue of the Brooklyn Journal of
      Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
will be devoted to
      these papers.

Continue reading

March 15, 2007 in Conferences & Symposia | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)