Wednesday, December 6, 2017

Reinstatement Denied For Debt Payment Issues

A series of Whereas clauses explain why the Maryland Court of Appeals has denied reinstatement to an attorney who was indefinitely suspended in 2014.

WHEREAS, Petitioner has existing financial obligations, i.e., debt in form of amounts owed to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the State of Maryland, and the United States Department of Education totaling in excess of $1 million;

WHEREAS, Petitioner has entered into payment plans with the IRS and the Comptroller of Maryland requiring monthly installment payments;

WHEREAS, Petitioner has an account with the United States Department of Education which is in default and has been placed with Coast Professional, Inc., a debt collection agency;

WHEREAS, as evidenced at oral argument, Petitioner has made only two payments of $2,500 to the IRS on February 10, 2017 and May 16, 2017, respectively, and one payment of $250 on May 18, 2017 to the United States Department of Education;

WHEREAS, Petitioner has advised the Court of Appeals of Maryland without further explanation that, with respect to employment, during the period of suspension, he considered various entrepreneurial activities;

WHEREAS, since the suspension on August 17, 2014, thirty (30) days after issuance of the Court of Appeals of Maryland's opinion, to the present, Petitioner has not sought and maintained consistent employment;

WHEREAS, the Court determines that Petitioner has not demonstrated the requisite character and competence to practice law for reinstatement...

Denied. (Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2017/12/a-series-of-whereass-explain-why-the-maryland-court-of-appeals-has-denied-reinstatement-to-an-attorney-who-was-indefinitely-s.html

Bar Discipline & Process | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment