Friday, February 28, 2014

No Utter Refutation

The New York Appellate Division for the Second Judicial Department affirmed a trial court order declining to dismiss a legal malpractice claim.

The facts

The plaintiff's sister worked for the defendant law firm, in which the individual defendants are partners. During his sister's employment, the plaintiff came to learn of an investment opportunity being organized by the defendants, which involved providing high interest, short-term loans for the development of real estate. The plaintiff and his wife decided to participate. Two bank checks, one of which was purchased by the plaintiff's wife and bore only her name, were forwarded to the defendants for the purpose of making two loans. When these two loans were not repaid in full, the plaintiff commenced this action seeking to recover from the defendants the money that he was owed, claiming that the defendants effectively borrowed the money from him (first and second causes of action). In the alternative, the plaintiff sought damages for legal malpractice (third cause of action). The plaintiff made a pre-discovery motion for summary judgment on the complaint, and the defendants cross-moved, inter alia, to dismiss the second cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(3), for lack of standing, and to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), based upon documentary evidence. The Supreme Court denied the motion and the cross motion.

The court here comncluded that the law firm's documentary evidence failed to "utterly refute" the plaintiff's claims. (Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2014/02/the-new-york-appellate-division-for-the-second-judicial-department-affirmed-a-trial-court-order-declining-to-dismiss-a-legal.html

Clients | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01a511788c3c970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference No Utter Refutation:

Comments

Post a comment