Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Better To Be A Lawyer than A Doctor (In Connecticut)

The Connecticut Supreme Court has held that physician disciplinary proceedings before the Medical Examining Board are properly governed by a preponderance of the evidence standard of proof.

The court affirmed the imposition of discipline.

The doctor had argued that the higher "clear and convincing evidence" standard that is applied in lawyer discipline matters should also apply to physicians.

The court disagreed:

...the plaintiff suggests that the disciplinary procedures to which attorneys are subjected has some bearing on the appropriate disciplinary procedures applied to physicians. We are not persuaded... the plaintiffs arguments fails to recognize that attorney discipline, unlike physician discipline, is overseen by the judicial branch....physician discipline is administered by the [Medical Examining Board], which is unquestionably an administrative agency under the [Uniform Administrative Procedure Act], Thus, because there is no indication that the legislature intended to impose a heightened standard of proof in cases involving physician discipline, we decline to depart from the default standard [of proof]...

Better to be a lawyer in hot water in Connecticut than a doctor. (Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2013/08/better-to-be-a-lawyer-than-a-doctor-in-connecticut.html

Bar Discipline & Process, Comparative Professions | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0192ac652b84970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Better To Be A Lawyer than A Doctor (In Connecticut):

Comments

Post a comment