Thursday, February 7, 2013

Recusal When Judge Consults Law Firm

A recent opinion from the Florida Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee concludes that a judge need not be recused from matters involving a law firm with which he had explored representation:

Here, the inquiring judge consulted an attorney  from a very large law firm about a possible claim.  The claim was investigated but no lawsuit was  ever filed and nothing came of the consultation.  That was a year ago.  No social relationship has developed between  the inquiring judge and the attorney whom the judge consulted or the attorney’s  firm.  The Committee unanimously opines  that the inquiring judge need not recuse automatically from any cases in which  the attorney or that firm files an appearance.

The opinion was not unanimous:

Nine members of  the Committee opine that the need to disclose the inquiring judge’s  consultation with the attorney/law firm, in cases where either the attorney or  the law firm appears before the judge, must be decided on a case-by-case basis  based on the factors stated above.  Three  members of the Committee opine that the judge should be required to disclose  the consultation for a reasonable period of time.

(Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2013/02/a-recent-opinion-from-the-florida-judicial-ethics-advisory-committee-concludes-that-a-judge-need-not-be-recused-from-matters.html

Judicial Ethics and the Courts | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017ee84e3e3f970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Recusal When Judge Consults Law Firm:

Comments

Post a comment