Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Loyalty Trumps Mobility In New Mexico Decision

In a case of first impression, the New Mexico Supreme Court has held that disqualification is mandatory when an associate who played a 'substantial role" in litigation and possesses confidential information moves to a firm involved in the litigation against her former client.

Both the moving associate and her new firm are barred from further representation.

The court noted that it had adopted a more restricted version of Rule 1.11than the ABA Model Rule, and that its rule does not permit screening to prevent imputed disqualification.

While the rule may have a chilling consequence for lawyer mobility, the court emphasized that the public policy considerations that underpin the loyalty to clients justifies the result:

In the practice of law, there is no higher duty than one's loyalty to a client.

(Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2012/12/loyalty-trumps-mobility-in-new-mexico-decision.html

Clients, Current Affairs, Law Firms | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017d3eb4d09b970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Loyalty Trumps Mobility In New Mexico Decision:

Comments

Page 3 of the opinion incorrectly says that Gandy Dancer, a construction company in Albuquerque, is a "Law Firm" -- wonder where that came from?

"BNSF hired a Law Firm, Gandy Dancer, LLC (Gandy Dancer), to construct the new berms, dykes, and channel."

Posted by: Robert Gould | Dec 12, 2012 6:46:03 AM

Post a comment