Thursday, October 11, 2012

Attorney's Creditor Not Entitled To Invoke Escrow Rule

The Michigan Attorney Discipline Board has concluded that there is insufficient evidence of any ethical violations and dismissed a matter in which a tri-county panel found misconduct.

The accused attorney represented another attorney in a client dispute in probate court. Sanctions of over $31,000 were imposed against the client and paid to the respondent attorney's law firm.

The sanctions were reversed on appeal and the client sought repayment from the respondent and/or his firm. The probate court denied the relief sought and a bar complaint was filed.

The board found that the situation did not implicate Rule 1.15 (safekeeping property).

The rule does not "contain[] within it a requirement subjecting an attorney to professional discipline whenever an attorney's creditor does not receive prompt payment of a sum (not held in trust and properly so) that an attorney's creditor in 'entitled to receive' "  (Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2012/10/the-michigan-attorney-discipline-boardhas-concluded-that-there-isinsufficient-evidence-of-any-ethical-violations-and-dismisse.html

Bar Discipline & Process | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017c32762fb6970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Attorney's Creditor Not Entitled To Invoke Escrow Rule:

Comments

Post a comment