Friday, June 1, 2012

Not Flat But Special

The Iowa Supreme Court has issued a public reprimand of an attorney who attempted to expand his Colorado immigation practice into the Hawkeye state.

The attorney received what he called a flat fee from an immigration client. The court had a different description of the fee -- a special retainer. The attorney failed to treat the fee as entrusted and did not comply with rules governing unearned fees.

The court did make a rather interesting remark about allegations that the attorney violated advertising rules:

We choose not to address the Board's claim that [the attorney] violated our rules pertaining to lawyer advertising because even if we were to find that he did, we would not impose a greater sanction than is required for [his] trust account infractions...

Iowa has always had the most stringent rules on lawyer advertising. Is this comment a signal that the court may be softening its stance? (Mike Frisch)

Bar Discipline & Process | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Not Flat But Special:


Post a comment