Friday, May 25, 2012

Joke No Basis For Untimely Recusal Claim

The New York Appellate Division for the First Judicial Department affirmed the denial of a motion to recuse a trial judge:

Plaintiff filed the instant recusal motion after the court dismissed the complaint. Thus, the trial court lacked the authority to grant the motion absent proof of actual prejudice or biased actions, rather than the mere appearance of impropriety, and there is no basis for mandatory disqualification or recusal. The trial court's generalized comments comparing judicial salaries to first year attorney salaries as recently reported in the news, coupled with an attendant joke that he might have to seek employment with defendants' counsel's law firm, stand in stark contrast to the facts in Caperton v A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc. (556 US 868 [2009]), relied upon by plaintiff, in which the president and chief executive officer of a corporation appearing as a defendant before the judge against whom recusal was sought had contributed some $3 million to his election campaign and at issue was a $50 million judgment against the defendant corporation. Here, there is no basis to conclude that actual bias or prejudice existed. No evidence was offered to show that the trial judge had any relationship with defendants' counsel outside of the courtroom, that the trial judge was seeking, or intended to seek employment with the law firm, or that the court was in anyway biased in favor of defendants.

Moreover, where, as here, a party inexplicably withholds an allegation of bias until after the court adversely rules against it, denial of the recusal motion is generally warranted and the courts' discretion in so ruling will not be disturbed. Plaintiff's claims of bias are undermined by his continued participation in the court proceedings for nearly a year after the disputed comments were made, without complaint. Furthermore, the dismissal of plaintiff's "amended" action was soundly based upon a prior federal district Court decision which this Court previously found disposed of plaintiff's fundamental arguments. (citations omitted)

(Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2012/05/the-new-york-appellate-division-for-the-first-judicial-department-affirmed-the-denial-of-a-motion-to-recuse-a-trial-hudge.html

Judicial Ethics and the Courts | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef016766c7b18b970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Joke No Basis For Untimely Recusal Claim:

Comments

Post a comment