Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Mistaken For Jew, Employee May Sue

The New Jersey Appellate Division has reversed an order of summary judgment as to two of three defendants sued under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination ("LAD").

The plaintiff (a truck driver) had claimed to be subject to regular anti-Semitic comments from the defendants, who mistakenly thought that he was Jewish. The trial court held that the fact that the plaintiff was not in fact Jewish barred the action.

The court here found that conclusion to be erroneous as a matter of law:

...the individual defendants, all of whom were plaintiff's supervisors, were motivated by their belief that plaintiff was Jewish, and thus engaged in "real discrimination and harassment" of the kind that the LAD seeks to eliminate...That their target happened not to be Jewish should not serve to excuse their conduct.

The defendants had initially denied the comments had been made until a DVD was produced by the plaintiff that had such expressions as "Jew Bag," "F... you Hebrew," "Jew Bastard," "If you were a German, we would burn you in the oven," and "Only a Jew would argue over his hours."

At his deposition, one of the defendants admitted that the DVD was accurate and that he "used the song Hava Nagila as the ring tone for calls on his cell phone from plaintiff." (Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2012/04/the-new-jersey-appellate-division-has-reversed-an-order-of-summary-judgment-as-to-two-of-three-defendants-sued-under-the-new.html

Law & Business, Law & Society | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0168ea4e63a0970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mistaken For Jew, Employee May Sue:

Comments

Post a comment