Monday, February 27, 2012

Courts Can't Impose Pro Bono Penalty

The Maryland Court of Appelas reversed the Court of Special Appeals and held that 'the consideration that one party was represented on a pro bono basis, in an award of attorneys' fees to the other party who had retained counsel was erroneous under [the statute governing awards of costs and fees in family law matters]" and remanded for reconsideration of the statutory factors.

The case involved a custody modification proceeding. The petitioner was represented pro bono by the Sexual Assault Legal Institute. Her ex-husband retained counsel and accumulated over $70,000 in legal fees.

The trial court ordered the petitioner to pay  her ex-huband over $30,000 in legal fees and costs because "she was in a better financial position than [the ex-husband], due to her having received pro bono representation..." (Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2012/02/courts-cant-impose-pro-bono-penalty.html

Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0167631056ad970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Courts Can't Impose Pro Bono Penalty:

Comments

Post a comment