December 8, 2011
Hazard's Opinions Sufficient To Withstand Summary Judgment Motion
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals has reversed the grant of summary judgment to three defendants in a legal malpractice case. The attorneys had represented the client in an employment case.
The court held that the opinions of Professor Geoffrey Hazard were sufficient to defeat the motion. Although not an employment law expert, the professor is an expert in legal ethics and the general conduct of litigation. These areas of expertise were sufficient to create issues for a jury. (Mike Frisch)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hazard's Opinions Sufficient To Withstand Summary Judgment Motion: