Wednesday, December 7, 2011

The Golden Rule: No Golden Rule Arguments

A conviction of a criminal defendant for the murder of his wife was reversed by the Mississippi Supreme Court. The defendant had admitted that he pointed a loaded gun at the deceased.

The prosecutor in closing rebuttal argument made an improper "golden-rule" argument that repeatedly asked the jurors how they would feel with a loaded shotgun pointed at their face.

The court here found that the argument was improper and warranted a new trial. (Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2011/12/a-conviction-of-a-criminal-defendant-for-the-murder-of-his-wife-was-reversed-by-the-mississippi-supreme-court-the-defendant.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef015437fc44f4970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Golden Rule: No Golden Rule Arguments:

Comments

Post a comment