Monday, April 11, 2011

A Question Of Fact

A case summary from the Kentucky Court of Appeals:

The Court reversed and remanded a summary judgment in favor of a lawyer and law firm on appellant’s claim for reimbursement of all or part of a $10,000 fee paid during representation of appellant in a criminal matter after he plead guilty in lieu of going to trial. The Court held that the written fee agreement between the parties for trial preparation and trial, consisting of letters between the parties, was ambiguous as to the question of whether appellant would be entitled to a partial reimbursement of the subject fee in the event that the case did not proceed to trial. In light of the ambiguous nature of the parties’ fee agreement, there were genuine issues of material fact that could not properly be resolved via summary judgment. Because the parties did not create a fee contract that addressed the issue of who was entitled to what in the event that a trial did not take place, the question would have to be resolved by a finder of fact.

The opinion is linked here. (Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2011/04/a-case-summary-from-the-kentucky-court-of-appeals-the-court-reversed-and-remanded-a-summary-judgment-in-favor-of-a-lawyer-a.html

Billable Hours, Clients, Economics | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef014e876744b3970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Question Of Fact:

Comments

Post a comment