Monday, November 15, 2010
Noting that disbarment is permanent and thus reserved for the most serious misconduct, the Indiana Supreme Court found that disbarment was appropriate in a matter involving a pattern of neglect in multiple client matters as well as a series of intentional misrepresentations to the Disciplinary Commission.
The attorney had created a fraudulent receipt, forged the client's name to it and submitted it as evidence with the intent to deceive the Commission. (Mike Frisch)
...is the title of a presentation we do annually at Georgetown Law to provide students with information about selecting and passing a state bar as well as admission issues relating to character and fitness to practice. This web link should take the interested student to the one-hour talk.
Thanks to recent Georgetown graduates Sarah Black and Tim Daly for their insights.
While the video does not cover "everything," perhaps there are some useful tips. (Mike Frisch)