Friday, May 7, 2010

Dissent In "Easy Case"

The Indiana Supreme Court has held that a law firm defendant did not waive the statute of limitations defense in a legal malpractice case by failing to raise the issue in response to the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. The underlying case was a medical malpractice action against a VA hospital. The court majority concluded:

...[plaintiff] moved for partial summary judgment, seeking only a decision that the defendants were negligent as a matter of law. If [plaintiff] wanted to move for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, her motion should have so stated .She did not. She cannot now claim a victory greater than she sought and greater than she placed in issue.

Justice Rucker dissented and would find the defense waived:

Easy case.

(Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2010/05/the-indiana-supreme-court-has-held-that-a-law-firm-defendant-did-not-waive-the-statute-of-limitations-defense-in-a-legal-malp.html

Clients | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0133ed616e4b970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dissent In "Easy Case":

Comments

Post a comment