Tuesday, June 30, 2009

"Stun Belt" Reversal

The New York Court of Appeals has reversed a criminal conviction of a defendant charged with the murder by strangulation of a 14 year old victim. The trial court had ordered the defendant to wear a "stun belt" restraint during the trial. The court here reversed the affirmance of the conviction by the Appellate Division, concluding that forcing a defendant to wear the belt absent any showing that he was a danger at trial that would justify the use of the belt.

A dissent would hold that the presumption of innocence was not implicated: "...defendant failed to show that the stun belt was visible to the jury or otherwise compromised the fundamental fairness of the trial; he never objected that the stun belt impaired his ability to communicate with his attorney or meaningfully participate in his defense. Since I therefore do not believe that the defendant has shown any actual prejudice, I would affirm his conviction." (Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2009/06/stun-belt-reversal.html

Law & Society | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0115709a0a75970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Stun Belt" Reversal:

Comments

Post a comment