Friday, May 15, 2009

Cocked Or Not, Disbarment Imposed

The North Dakota Supreme Court has disbarred an attorney for, among other things, a criminal conviction for terrorizing a Fargo police officer with a gun while intoxicated. The court did agree with the attorney that the evidence did not establish that the gun was cocked:

The hearing panel's finding to which Light continues to object--that the handgun he pointed at the Fargo police officer was cocked--is, however, not supported by clear and convincing evidence. As Disciplinary Counsel points out, Light admitted the allegations contained in the Petition for Discipline dated November 30, 2007, but those allegations do not include a description of the handgun. Although Light also admitted the allegations in the Petition for Discipline dated August 23, 2007, relating to the criminal charges, stating that he admits he pleaded guilty to a class C felony as described in the Petition, again, the description of the gun as being cocked was not part of those allegations. Neither is the handgun description part of the criminal judgment found in the record. We do not know whether the gun was described as being cocked in the criminal information by which Light was charged, because that document is not part of the record. Whether the handgun was cocked, however, is not significant for purposes of the finding that Light was convicted of a class C felony under N.D.C.C. ยง 12.1-17-04, which incurs the consequences set forth in N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.1.

An earlier article about the case from the Bismarck Tribune is linked here. (Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2009/05/the-north-dakota-supreme-court-hasdisbarred.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0115708a78d4970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cocked Or Not, Disbarment Imposed:

Comments

Pointed at a Fargo police officer? At a Fargo police officer? And you do not have anything more to say about that, Mike????

Posted by: Alan Childress | May 15, 2009 8:00:36 AM

"do not have anything more to say about that, Mike?"

Surely that was your job, Alan?

Funny how everything today is terrorism related. He terrorised the police officer. I don't know many cops who would like to be described as being terrorised by a gun. Most I know tend to be the macho type who would describe themselves as being cool under fire. The term terrorism seems to have lost its meaning post 9/11.

Stephen

Posted by: FixedWing | May 16, 2009 6:59:03 AM

Post a comment