Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Still A Judge

The New York Commission on Judicial Conduct censured a city court judge who while engaged in a part-time law practice had (1) arranged to have charges against a client sent to a court that had no jurisdiction to handle the case and avoid a prohibition against practicing in his own court, (2) failed to disqualify himself or disclose a conflict in a case where he had previously represented the complaining witness, (3) violated a statute that prohibited his handling three matters that had originated in his court, and (4) drafted papers for a client for a matter in his own court without identifying himself as the client's attorney. The censure was deemed appropriate because he had been candid and cooperative and, as a now full-time judge, no longer practices law.

A dissent favored removal from office. Noting that the judge's exit from private practice did not mitigate and that his prior service as a district attorney aggravated the misconduct, the dissent does not mince words: "It is contrary to logic and precedent to leave a judge on the bench who has so egregiously violated the trust of judicial office by manipulating the very system in which he is a judge for his personal benefit and the benefit of a private client."

The commission's press release is linked here. (Mike Frisch)

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Still A Judge:


It is beyond my comprehension why anyone would consider even for a second that judges are not up to their eyeballs in these kinds of activities. Carte blanche baby. Again, carte blanche baby! Kinda catchy, eh?

Posted by: Blake Brown | Apr 1, 2009 8:43:38 PM

Post a comment