Monday, March 16, 2009

The High Road

A Virginia lawyer was reprimanded with terms in a case where he represented a divorcing wife. The husband's attorney filed a counterclaim alleging that the wife had "romantic encounters...with a person known to both parties. That person was the Respondent." He had non-suited the case "because he realized he likely could be a necessary witness in the pending litigation. " She then hired new counsel.

The Virginia Subcommittee found that the lawyer had violated Rule 3.7 (lawyer as witness). The terms imposed include a requirement to attend two CLE courses, one of which is Taking the High Road-- Ethics and Professionalism in Family Law Cases. (Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2009/03/the-high-road.html

Bar Discipline & Process | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0112796e86eb28a4

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The High Road:

Comments

Post a comment