Friday, April 4, 2008

No Good Deed Goes Unpunished

A Nebraska lawyer who had advanced sums to an unemployed personal-injury client "for such things as transportation and vehicle expenses, insurance premiums, and rent" was suspended  for 60 days by the Nebraska Supreme Court. Nebraska had modified its rule effective September 1, 1995, but the attorney's conduct was found to violate both versions of the rule. The court cites with approval a Maryland case holding that the rule has no exception for humanitarian acts. The court provides little, if any, explanation why suspension is the appropriate sanction.

I do not favor a blanket ban on financial assistance to a truly needy client regardless of the motive. While such payments should not be permitted to induce a prospective client to retain the lawyer or in circumstances that create a significant conflict of interest, a suspension for truly humanitarian help shocks my conscience.(Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2008/04/no-good-deed-go.html

Bar Discipline & Process | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e551a4acee8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference No Good Deed Goes Unpunished:

Comments

When I teach these rules, my students don't buy them at all.

Posted by: Alan Childress | Apr 4, 2008 6:26:01 AM

Note that the D.C. Bar's Rules, contrary to the ABA,permits an attorney to provide financial assistance to a client for living expenses.

Posted by: Jack Marshall | Apr 5, 2008 9:15:05 PM

Florida case law seems to permit this kind of supportive financial assistance. It hardly seems to be promoting litigation.

Posted by: John Flood | Apr 9, 2008 2:18:49 PM

And we wonder why people hate lawyers...

Posted by: WL | Apr 13, 2008 5:52:21 PM

Post a comment