Monday, November 5, 2007

Improper Cross Leads To New Trial

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a conviction for first degree murder, kidnapping, sexual assualt and related offenses in a case involving a particularly brutal and vicious crime. The victim was raped, beaten and buried while still alive. A court majority concludes that the prosecutor's cross-examination of the defendant on past sexual misconduct was "substantially beyond the scope and reach of character evidence" and was "noticeably prejudicial." Although "[t]he facts in this case are difficult to comprehend" the error in the scope of cross-examination requires a new trial.

A dissent would find that the prosecutor's examination was proper in light of the defendant's contention that he was a good family man and not capable of such violence. The dissent is "simply shocked" at the court majority's result.(Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2007/11/improper-cross-.html

Law & Society | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e54f8e8ce28834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Improper Cross Leads To New Trial:

Comments

Post a comment