Saturday, April 14, 2007

Impermissible Contingent Fee Provision

The Washington State Bar Association has issued a recent informal opinion concluding that it is impermissible for a lawyer to include a provision in a contingent fee case that obligates the client to pay litigation expenses advanced by the lawyer if the client rejects a reasonable offer of settlement. The opinion views such a provision as a violation of the otherwise unrestricted authority of the client to accept or reject an offer embodied in Rule 1.2(b). (Mike Frisch)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2007/04/limiting_settle.html

Billable Hours, Clients | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d83542bfc653ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Impermissible Contingent Fee Provision:

Comments

Post a comment