March 28, 2007
Ventry on Ethics in Tax: Historical Impact of Reporting Rules
Posted by Alan Childress
Dennis Ventry, Jr. (American Univ.--Law) has posted to SSRN his article, "Vices and Virtues of an Objective Reporting Standard." It also is in Tax Notes, vol. 12, at page 1085 (Sept. 2006). Here is his abstract:
Changes to the taxpayer substantial understatement penalty lay at the heart of the protracted controversy over practice standards in the 1980s. Practitioners objected to Treasury Department efforts to align professional standards with reporting requirements for taxpayers. Proposed amendments to Circular 230, released in 1986, would have prohibited practitioners from advising or recommending a reporting position or preparing or signing a tax return unless they could determine that the section 6661 substantial understatement penalty would not apply. Practitioners recoiled. Prevailing ethical guidelines of the major professional organizations merely required tax practitioners to render advice in good faith evidenced by a realistic possibility of success if litigated; prevailing guidelines did not require them to insure against potential tax liabilities. This article examines the love-hate relationship between the substantial understatement penalty and practitioners in the mid to late 1980s.
March 28, 2007 in Abstracts Highlights - Academic Articles on the Legal Profession | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ventry on Ethics in Tax: Historical Impact of Reporting Rules: