Saturday, February 10, 2007

Zacharias on Expanding the Ethical Role of the Lawyer in Pre-Retainer Consults and Obligations to Prospective Clients

Posted by Alan Childress
Fred Zacharias (San Diego) has posted to SSRN his article, "The Pre-Employment Ethical Role of Lawyers."  (He also just posted, and we posted on it, the one on lawyers' reputations--sort of like Leo DiCaprio competing against himself in the Oscars.)  The 2002 version of the Model Rules finally clarifies in Rule 1.18 that the conflict of interest rules and of course confidentiality both kick in for prospective clients.  But Fred envisions an obligation more comprehensive and educational to the client than simply preventing future contrary representations and similar obvious abuses.  Here is the abstract:

This article considers the nature and extent of lawyers' obligations to prospective clients. Most jurisdictions have rules forbidding certain kinds of representation, requiring that particular information be given clients in writing, and regulating fees. But professional code drafters, courts, and commentators have never addressed the broader issue of the lawyer's role at the retainer stage of representation, including whether lawyers have responsibility for providing prospective clients with candid Zachariasfc_3 advice regarding the course they should pursue.

The issue is important to clients. A lawyer's action may determine whether a client obtains any representation, competent representation, or a lawyer well-suited to the task. It also affects the client's consideration of alternatives - including alternative methods of resolving the legal matter and whether lower cost or specialized representation might be available.

The issue is equally important to the bar. Most legal ethics codes free lawyers to compete for all types of legal work, regardless of how experienced or qualified they are. The fiction that lawyers are fungible, or (at some level) equally competent, underlies the current regime of lawyer regulation and is designed, at least in part, to protect the guild. Although legal ethics regulation places restrictions on how lawyers may solicit business, once a prospective client comes to a lawyer, virtually the only explicit constraint on the lawyer's ability to accept the case is that the lawyer provide minimally competent service.

This article argues that the professional regulatory scheme should clarify and facilitate enforcement of lawyers' pre-employment obligations. Depending on one's view of existing law, this can be accomplished either through refined interpretation of the professional rules and common law standards or through amendments to the legal ethics codes. The article then analyzes the significance of defining a lawyer's pre-employment role for the legal ethics regime and external law regulating the bar. The article concludes by offering options, some designed to enhance enforcement of lawyers' pre-employment obligations and others that might serve as independent alternatives for achieving client protection.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2007/02/zacharias_on_ex.html

Abstracts Highlights - Academic Articles on the Legal Profession, Clients, Professional Responsibility | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d8353e6a0153ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Zacharias on Expanding the Ethical Role of the Lawyer in Pre-Retainer Consults and Obligations to Prospective Clients:

Comments

My daughters lawyer is extremely hard to contact, is evasive, and possibly not being truthful. He has told us he has 'hired a law student', to look into her case file, to see if she qualifies for a sentence reduction under the new 'crack law' that passed recently. Can I request the name of the law student from the lawyer, so that I can give him/her information I feel will be helpful in her case? This lawyer has recently been reprimanded for not keeping up with his cases, and not being forthcoming with information needed by other clients. Should I try and find a public defender, if we don't get results in the next few days, and what constitutes 'poor legal representation'?
Thanks in advance,
Judi

Posted by: judi | Jan 22, 2008 2:48:27 PM

Post a comment