Resources

Find Law & Development Profs
Google Scholar
Law Schools
SSRN

Free Legal Web Sites
Findlaw
JURIST

Blog Traffic

Since September 30, 2007

Blogware

Powered by TypePad

Notices

© Copyright All Rights Reserved
Contact post author for permissions

This is Editor Information Test

More information, I promise!

« Fundação Getúlio Vargas meeting on Institutions and Organizations | Main | Can Survey Evidence Shed Light on FDI Spillovers? »

August 7, 2008

New article by Arrunada and Andonova

"Common Law and Civil Law as Pro-Market Adaptations"  is now available on SSRN here.

Abstract: We argue that in the development of the Western legal system, cognitive departures are the main determinant of the optimal degree of judicial rule-making. Judicial discretion, seen here as the main distinguishing feature between both legal systems, is introduced in civil law jurisdictions to protect, rather than to limit, freedom of contract against potential judicial backlash. Such protection was unnecessary in common law countries, where free-market relations enjoyed safer judicial ground mainly due to their relatively gradual evolution, their reliance on practitioners as judges, and the earlier development of institutional checks and balances that supported private property rights. In our framework, differences in costs and benefits associated with self-interest and lack of information require a cognitive failure to be active.

August 7, 2008 in Research | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e553f14cf48834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New article by Arrunada and Andonova:

Comments

Post a comment