May 29, 2008
New Study Ranks State High Courts
Stephen Choi (NYU), G. Mitu Gulati (Duke) and Eric Posner (Chicago) have posted Which States Have the Best (and Worst) High Courts? in SSRN. Here's the abstract:
This paper ranks the high courts of the fifty states, based on their performance during the years 1998-2000, along three dimensions: opinion quality (or influence as measured by out-of-state citations), independence (or non-partisanship), and productivity (opinions written). We also discuss ways of aggregating these measures. California and Delaware had the most influential courts; Georgia and Mississippi had the most productive courts; and Rhode Island and New York had the most independent courts. If equal weight is given to each measure, then the top five states were: California, Arkansas, North Dakota, Montana, and Ohio. We compare our approach and results with those of other scholars and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, whose influential rankings are based on surveys of lawyers at big corporations.
Hat tip to Dave Hoffman, Concurring Opinions. [JH]
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New Study Ranks State High Courts: